Fraud, forgery and identity theft in the 1840s

 

PCC Will of Anne Slack 1843 PROB 11/ 1977

Researchers and writers use documents from The National Archives a lot. You will find references to these documents in the footnotes of many a scholarly volume, and we even have a guide to Citing documents in The National Archives.

But some of the documents we hold are fakes or forgeries, and sometimes the fact that they are fakes is what makes them interesting.

A case in point is the will of Anne Slack, proved in the Prerogative Court of Canterbury (PCC) in 1843. It reads as follows:

I, ANNE SLACK Spinster formerly of Smith Street Chelsea but now of South Terrace Pimlico do make this my last Will and Testament as follows that is to say I give devise and bequeath unto my beloved Niece Emma Slack the sum of three thousand five hundred pounds sterling in the three pr cent consolidated annuities now standing in my name in the Books of the Bank of England and also all my money and securities for money of what nature or kind soever and wheresoever the same shall be at the time of my death and I do appoint and constitute my said niece sole executrix of this my last Will and Testament hereby revoking and making void all and every other will or wills at any time heretofore made by me and do declare this to be my last Will and Testament In Witness whereof I the said Anne Slack have hereunto set my hand and seal this third day of June in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and forty two –Anne Slack – Signed and sealed by the above named Anne Slack as and for her my last Will and Testament in the presence of us who at her request and in her presence have subscribed our names as witnesses thereto – Jane Perkins — Willm Williams

PROVED at London 22nd March 1843 before the Worshipful Augustus Frederick Bayford Doctor of Laws and Surrogate by the Oath of Emma Slack Spinster the Niece the sole Executrix to whom Admon was granted having been first sworn to administer.

It was one of a number of fictitious wills that were the subject of a case known as ‘The Will Forgeries’. Several members of an organized gang were convicted in this case at the Old Bailey in 1844. They identified dormant accounts in the Bank of England that contained large sums of money, then forged wills in the names of the account holders and registered fictitious deaths in the same names. Armed with the death certificates and wills, they obtained probate from the PCC at Doctor’s commons, presented the grants of probate to the Bank and collected the money.

Doctors Commons interior

Doctors Commons from Knight's London (undated)

This will was accompanied by a death certificate for Anne Slack, spinster, aged 72, of South Terrace, Pimlico, a fictitious address. The real Anne Slack was a spinster, aged about 36 in 1843, who lived at Abbots Langley with her sister and brother-in-law. She was still living there with them in 1851. It was remarkably easy to obtain a death certificate up to 1874, when the law was changed. Prior to that, no medical certification was required, so the informant’s word was enough for the registrar to issue a death certificate.

It was a very high-profile case, with people queuing for the public gallery and avidly reading lengthy reports in the papers. The story of the gang, how they operated, and the events surrounding their trial and conviction is a fascinating one. Anne Slack was just one of a number of victims of this gang, so this is not the only fictitious document among the PCC wills, or the death registrations held by the General Register Office.

Tags

,

5 comments

  1. Christine Hancock says:

    Interesting Post. You tend to assume copies of Wills in the archives are genuine.
    By coincidence I have just spent the afternoon writing a blog about one of my experiences with PCC wills. http://wp.me/p26gqp-2t
    After reading this I wonder if one of mine might have been forged.

  2. Ryan Rhea says:

    pretty good insights. I’ll be sure to stop by and read more from you. thanks.

  3. joan mcbride says:

    First of all your story is very interesting and well written.
    20 Years ago I was given a will in connection with family history. At that time I had no reason to think it way not be genuine. The people and places exist in the time frame. I would love to know if it is the real deal.I recently tried to find some reference to the will on the Internet but without success. Whilst researching this will I came across an article concerning another family member who inherited above family members of the deceased. Hmm! I wonder if it is best to let it rest. Good luck with your other research

  4. Gabriella McCree says:

    I don’t normally bother with blogs but I’m so pleased I did. The more I find out, about my own ancestors, the more questions seem to surface, that’s why I love family history and I’m learning not to take everything on face value.

    Thank you for these insights into your records.

  5. Stephanie Holliday says:

    My great grandfather’s first wife Georgiana Dorey was in this gang. She was sentenced to two years hard labour in Newgate prison.
    It was a very famous case for many reasons. One of the defendants was sent to Australia but later pardoned. Even so the govenment didn’t pay for him to come back to England. but he finaly got back (fascinating information about this in the New South Wales press as he asked for loans from the people of Australia to help him). He was eventually compensated by the government and was probably the only person to ever be so.
    I found this all out by googling their names. I was amazed to find them. It was widely reported in the UK and abroad. Many newspapers are online now as well as the trial documents at the Old Bailey.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We will not be able to respond to personal family history research questions on this platform.
See our moderation policy for more details.