They think it’s all over …

… when it’s really just beginning! My colleague Cathy Williams brings you her final update on The Record of London 2012.

The Olympic record logoCathy writes: My first – very first – blogpost in May posed questions about the history of the Olympic and Paralympic Games pre-London 2012 and the promised legacies post-2012, but this time I want you to think about what the questions might be in the future about London 2012.  What will researchers want to know or uncover? What will they want to analyse or interrogate?  What sort of data will they need and in what form?

Perhaps they’ll want to focus on the stiff and highly visible security measures implemented at all venues? Or consider the accusations of cheating levelled by the French at GB’s high-performing cyclists? (Did they really imagine our wheels could be ‘more round’ than theirs?!) or maybe question the anglocentric themes of the Olympic Opening and Closing Ceremonies? or measure the impact of the Paralympics on the way society views disability or physical impairment?

Before the Games began, they were being touted as the ‘Digital Games’, the ‘Green Games’, the ‘Legacy Games’ … but after the event, they might be better labelled as the ‘Yorkshire Games’ with a massive medal haul for the county at the Olympics? Or more seriously, as the ‘Women’s Games’?

An August edition of TIME Magazine ran a piece entitled Wonder Women highlighting the female ‘firsts’ at London 2012: it was the first Olympics in which all participating teams – including Qatar, Brunei and Saudi Arabia – sent both genders (except for Nauru but that wasn’t because women were deliberately excluded but because no women qualified!); Gabrielle Douglas became the first African-American US gymnast to win the women’s all-round title; and women’s boxing was recognised as an Olympic sport, the competitors narrowly avoiding having to wear skirts!

And that was before the Paralympics where, for GB, more women triumphed: Sarah Storey equalled Baroness Tanni Grey-Thompson’s medal tally to become one of Britain’s greatest Paralympians – perhaps even more of an achievement having gained them first as a swimmer now as a cyclist; Sophie Christiansen took three equestrian golds when her team mate Lee Pearson had been expected to complete the hat-trick; and our first ever gold in Paralympic sailing went to Helena Lucas.

But the medal winners and medal tables tell the tangible stories of the Games; making the intangible as visible and measuring its impact will be more difficult.

Debate has already begun on the future challenges for the Olympic and Paralympic Movements from global and more local perspectives:

  • Does the Games always have a positive impact on the urban environment for the host city?
  • How will the Games continue to promote cultural, ethnic and gender diversity?
  • Will there be more Paralympic athletes competing in future Olympic events until it seems logical to combine the Games?
  • Have the Games become too big? In the current global economic climate, how will future cities justifiably afford to host them?
  • Where does inspiration come from? Can the Games really inspire long-term engagement in sporting and physical activity?
  • Is there an over-emphasis on winning and not on taking part, as was Coubertin’s original vision? How can the IOC lessen the ‘pressure of the podium’ when continued funding depends on continued success?
  • Is there a tension between nationalism and Olympism with host nations using the Games as a showcase opportunity rather than simply playing host to the world?
  • Can the Games – and international sport – remain immune from politics particularly where countries might have questionable approaches to human rights?

By encouraging records creators and collectors to contribute to The Olympic Record, The National Archives is working to ensure that researchers of today and tomorrow will find those records that help them both frame and answer those questions – in whatever format, on whatever platform – and so provide them with the evidence they need to support or challenge their own hypotheses.

And to lead the way, we’ve just announced the signing of an agreement with the London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games and Paralympic Games (LOCOG), the British Olympic Association (BOA) and the International Olympic Committee (IOC) which means the deposit of LOCOG’s records at The National Archives post-Games.

So we’re not only doing our bit, but we’re helping you to do yours!

Cathy Williams

Head of Collections Knowledge

The National Archives

2 comments

  1. David Matthew says:

    It is in my view too early to decide upon the impact of the Olympics and Paralympics upon the UK although the Commonwealth Games in Manchester in 2002 were the first international event where able-bodied and non able-bodied competitors competed in the same games, and in one case the same event, as they will in Glasgow.

    I note that the question of corporate sponsorship is not mentioned and which in the UK only started in 1986 at the Commonwealth Games in Edinburgh and the limitations put on businesses in London who lost money. Certainly 2012 can be described as the Women’s Games or the Digital Games and both have equal claims although women have been catching up with the number of events compared with the men and that has taken 50 years and the idea that broadcasters should broadcast more women’s events like football.

    It is disappointing to find out that in an age of government transparency that certain documents about the 2012 Games are being closed for up to 15 years, including the ticketing fiasco?.

    1. Cathy Williams says:

      Thanks for your comments, David. With LOCOG’s records being a deposit from a private owner, The National Archives could only encourage them to make the records as open as early as possible, not dictate the period of closure. So TNA has to respect the IOC’s concerns over what will remain active business records supporting the delivery of the Games for the next fifteen years; while they may not be directly available to researchers, they will certainly be used!

      You’ll be pleased to hear that we’re actually starting to focus on the commercial side of the Games – it was always something we had planned to do, to ensure as complete a picture of London 2012 as possible. Keep checking ‘The Olympic Record’ website where we shall feature content relating to the official sponsors and partners.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

We will not be able to respond to personal family history research questions on this platform.
See our moderation policy for more details.