Search results found for: PRONOM Technology and innovationPRONOM: A database centenaryThursday 24 February 2022Recently The National Archives released the 100th version of PRONOM but many people may...Technology and innovationAn introduction to the PRONOM contribution model and the Signature Developer roleThursday 26 July 2012My name is David Clipsham and I have been employed as the File Format...Managing informationDoes PRONOM dream of electric DROIDs?Monday 27 February 2012Greetings from Digital Preservation! One of the challenges we face in our department is...Archives and archivistsThe future for archives on a global scaleFriday 28 October 2016I am excited to announce the arrival of 'Archives Inspire the world', our invitation...Archives and archivistsTransforming Archives: Norfolk Record OfficeThursday 6 October 2016I realise how fruitful my time was, devoted mainly to exploring the world of...Technology and innovationIdentifying digital file formats – a collaborative effortFriday 10 June 2016Have you got a file format you can't identify? Send it to PRONOM, an...Managing informationCSV validator – a new digital preservation toolMonday 14 July 2014Today marks the official release of a new digital preservation tool developed by The...Technology and innovationBring out your dead (files)Friday 8 February 2013On Monday 28 January, the Digital Preservation Coalition (DPC) hosted a file formats day of...Technology and innovationEmulation’s what you need?Thursday 25 October 2012In computing, emulation is the practice of creating a virtual environment in order to replicate...Records and researchTrainee Tuesday: Digital Preservation is for everyone!Tuesday 25 September 2012As part of my Opening Up Archives traineeship at the West Yorkshire Archive Service,...Managing informationWriter’s Block…Thursday 6 September 2012Ask anyone in our department at The National Archives and they will say I’m...Managing informationWhen 900 years old, you reach… Look as good, you will not…Monday 3 September 2012I think that was the quote we were looking for? Ok, maybe not but... 1 2 »
