My colleague looked at the article with a mixture of surprise and mild horror.
We were part of the way through an afternoon of Wikipedia training and she had decided to have a gander at the article on Historical geography. Take a look if you like. It wonâ€™t take long, itâ€™s only about four paragraphs and thatâ€™s a paragraph longer than when she found it – which is the point Iâ€™d like to make. When confronted with a hopeless Wikipedia article (and goodness knows there are plenty of those) there are really two reactions. One is to tut, mutter darkly about the deficiencies of crowdsourced knowledge and consider another source of information. The second is to fix it.
At The National Archives, after some consideration, weâ€™ve decided to take the second option. Weâ€™re going to train more staff and run more projects across Wikimedia Foundation websites. Weâ€™ve already started. Today you can stand next to Domesday Book, scan a QRpedia code with your phone and access information on the book from Wikipedia in 40 languages – a forest of labels we could never produce on our own.