… when itâ€™s really just beginning! My colleague Cathy Williams brings you her final update on The Record of London 2012.
Cathy writes: My first – very first – blogpost in May posed questions about the history of the Olympic and Paralympic Games pre-London 2012 and the promised legacies post-2012, but this time I want you to think about what the questions might be in the future about London 2012.Â What will researchers want to know or uncover? What will they want to analyse or interrogate?Â What sort of data will they need and in what form?
Perhaps theyâ€™ll want to focus on the stiff and highly visible security measures implemented at all venues? Or consider the accusations of cheating levelled by the French at GBâ€™s high-performing cyclists? (Did they really imagine our wheels could be â€˜more roundâ€™ than theirs?!) or maybe question the anglocentric themes of the Olympic Opening and Closing Ceremonies? or measure the impact of the Paralympics on the way society views disability or physical impairment?
Before the Games began, they were being touted as the â€˜Digital Gamesâ€™, the â€˜Green Gamesâ€™, the â€˜Legacy Gamesâ€™ … but after the event, they might be better labelled as the â€˜Yorkshire Gamesâ€™ with a massive medal haul for the county at the Olympics? Or more seriously, as the â€˜Womenâ€™s Gamesâ€™?