The National Archives was pleased to host the third annual Archives Discovery Forum on 7 March. The Forum brings together information and archives professionals from across the UK to talk about how to open up access to collections and information about collections. You can see the full programmeÂ on the UK Archives Discovery Network (UKAD) website. The Forum is a key part of the work of the UKAD network, to get people together and discussing progress in this area. That can be about major changes to standards affecting the sector internationally or about improving awareness of individual archivesâ€™ collections, and anything in between. We know not everyone in the sector is progressing at the same rate, but so long as everyone is going in the same direction, towards ever-broadening access,Â there is value in sharing our progress.
The event has over 20 speakers and multiple parallel sessions, so giving a flavour of the day is just that: a flavour! I didnâ€™t want to bring you only my view, though. (Iâ€™m an incurable organiser, and part of my impression of any conference Iâ€™m supporting is always about moving chairs and refilling water jugs.Â Not to mention the horror of realising there’s no tea five minutes before the tea break – likely to spark a bloody revolution among the assembled archivists). So Iâ€™ve asked colleagues to help me to compile a mosaic of impressions of the day, augmented by examples fromÂ theÂ #ukad twitter stream. Thanks for all your comments on the day.
What were people hearing and saying?
â€˘ Loving the big possibilities: the Google Cultural Institute and Wikipedia Commons (with a global monthly readership of 500 million!)
â€˘ Talk about â€śdigestible narrativesâ€ť to open up interest in collections: a lot of interest, but also some challenge (â€śWhere does digestible narrative end and where does dumbing down commence?â€ť).
â€˘ Archives are also artefacts: donâ€™t be embarrassed to celebrate how good documents can look and how this attracts attention.
â€˘ The value of working with enthusiasts: promoting the Archives and Artefacts Study Network.
â€˘ “I’ve got a new fundraising strategy. I’m going to marry a Rothschild.” (Suspect that may be a very *old* strategy, says our tweeter.)
â€˘ Standing room only for the digital records discussion!
â€˘ â€śIn the past, archivists have not defined archival description: it has defined us.â€ť
â€˘ Advice from a small collection on profile-raising: â€śGet out there, be visible. Add value, hang around in the tea room and talk to people!â€ť
What were their key challenges?
â€˘ Can The National Archives build linked data on top of Discovery? (â€śThe single most useful thing you could do for the sector is issue the National Register of Archives as linked data.â€ť)
â€˘ â€śGoogle arenâ€™t going to do it for us.â€ť
â€˘ The tensions of â€śeverything should be openâ€ť versus â€śwhat can we charge forâ€ť as income generation becomes increasingly essential to survival for many archives.
â€˘ Lack of standards in digitisation, especially standards for naming: storing up trouble and lack of searchability for the future
â€˘ â€śOnline exhibitions are about showcasing, not comprehensiveness. Researchers always ask for comprehensiveness.â€ť
â€˘ Consistently poor exported data is easier to improve through automation than inconsistently good. Standardisation is a big part of success with data exports, even if itâ€™s a poor standard.
One message to take away?
â€˘ Start small, but do start! There are lots of tools put out there to support archive discovery: inertia is the hardest thing to fight. Not everything you experiment with will be successful, but think positive and push on with those that prove their value.
Slides and podcasts from the event will be available soon. Whether or not you were at the Discovery Forum this year, weâ€™d love to use this post to collect more examples of how archives are being opened up â€“ so do share in comments.