Spring. A time for new beginnings and, dare I say it, spring cleaning! With the season well underway your cleaning may be complete but what tools did you favour? A cloth, a vacuum, a duster? Here at The National Archives weâ€™ve investigated different cleaning methods to determine if we can improve our cleaning strategy. Will our results affect your spring clean?
Dust can be difficult to see so we used a white powder that fluoresces brightly under UV light in order to see the â€˜dustâ€™ during our experiments. This powder was sprinkled onto cardboard to mimic the dust seen on the boxes that contain records in the repositories. The â€˜dustyâ€™ surfaces were then cleaned under normal and UV light, using a microfibre cloth, a lambs’ wool duster and a HEPA filter vacuum cleaner (a High Efficiency Particulate Air filter, which can remove particles as small as 0.3 microns in diameter! Which means that vacuum cleaners with HEPA filters can remove smaller particles than those without). Each cleaning method was assessed for its ability to permanently remove â€˜dustâ€™ from the card. As youâ€™ll see from the video below, we had a clear winner.
The vacuum cleaner was most successful at removing the â€˜dustâ€™ and did so without causing redistribution of dust to surrounding surfaces. In sharp contrast, the lambsâ€™ wool duster was found to remove the least â€˜dustâ€™, causing itÂ to be ingrained into the cardboard surface and to be re-distributed â€“ can you see the plumes of powder during cleaning under UV light?Â As a result of this research lambsâ€™ wool dusters are no longer in use in our repositories, dry microfibre cloths will continue to be used, and weâ€™re looking into increasing the use of HEPA filter vacuum cleaners.